<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Battle For Wide-Angle Lens: Panasonic&#8217;s LX3 Meets Nemesis, Samsung&#8217;s HZ10W</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/</link>
	<description>Point, Click and Shoot Digital Macro Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 03:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-4718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 20:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-4718</guid>
		<description>I spent my money on the LX3 after an in depth &#039;shoot out&#039; between it &amp; the Leica D-Lux 4, Although they both use the same lens there is a slight difference in the coating, as to whether there is a difference in the programming, I doubt it. The resulting pics are so close it&#039;s not worth talking about, we are talking about a gnat&#039;s whisker here! Go &amp; spend almost twice the price on the Leica if you wish, if the red dot badge is so important to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent my money on the LX3 after an in depth &#8216;shoot out&#8217; between it &amp; the Leica D-Lux 4, Although they both use the same lens there is a slight difference in the coating, as to whether there is a difference in the programming, I doubt it. The resulting pics are so close it&#8217;s not worth talking about, we are talking about a gnat&#8217;s whisker here! Go &amp; spend almost twice the price on the Leica if you wish, if the red dot badge is so important to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Compared the Samsung wB550 with the LX3 and the wB550 is awful! If the HZ10W is like the WB550 it&#039;s junk. Terrible noise and picture quality. The LX3 is in another league of quality altogether... there is no comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared the Samsung wB550 with the LX3 and the wB550 is awful! If the HZ10W is like the WB550 it&#8217;s junk. Terrible noise and picture quality. The LX3 is in another league of quality altogether&#8230; there is no comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>Compared the Samsung wB550 with the LX3 and the wB550 is awful! If the HZ10W is like the WB550 it&#039;s junk. Terrible noise and picture quality. The LX3 is in another league of quality altogether... the is no comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compared the Samsung wB550 with the LX3 and the wB550 is awful! If the HZ10W is like the WB550 it&#8217;s junk. Terrible noise and picture quality. The LX3 is in another league of quality altogether&#8230; the is no comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Downes</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Downes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>I have beaten you all!
I took a broken digital camera, put in a kelloggs box with a pinhole and for less then a dime I have the world&#039;s first digital box camera.
and you people thought you were the thrift kings of 5th Avenue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have beaten you all!<br />
I took a broken digital camera, put in a kelloggs box with a pinhole and for less then a dime I have the world&#8217;s first digital box camera.<br />
and you people thought you were the thrift kings of 5th Avenue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toon</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>toon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 07:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>my samsung hz10w is nice camera, i like</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my samsung hz10w is nice camera, i like</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaxon S</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Well said... $400 extra is indeed a lot for what essentially is the same camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said&#8230; $400 extra is indeed a lot for what essentially is the same camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blork</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2009/01/15/battle-for-wide-angle-lens-panasonics-lx3-meets-nemesis-samsungs-hz10w/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>blork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=861#comment-481</guid>
		<description>The Panasonic LX3 and the Leica D-LUX 4 are not just similar, they *are* the same camera (Panasonic and Leica have a co-branding/co-manufuacturing arrangement). 

They come from the same factory and use the same parts. The only difference in build is that the LX3 has a grip and the D-LUX 4 does not (for aesthetic reasons). There are also supposed to be minor differences in the image processing engine, which Leica says give images from the D-LUX 4 a classic &quot;Leica&quot; look. 

There&#039;s one other difference: the D-LUX 4 costs almost twice as much, which is entirely a &quot;branding&quot; thing. *THAT* is why the LX3 is more popular. It has nothing to do with perception; it&#039;s the REALITY that most people won&#039;t spend $400 extra for a red sticker. (Although a few will, which is why some D-LUX 4s are being sold.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Panasonic LX3 and the Leica D-LUX 4 are not just similar, they *are* the same camera (Panasonic and Leica have a co-branding/co-manufuacturing arrangement). </p>
<p>They come from the same factory and use the same parts. The only difference in build is that the LX3 has a grip and the D-LUX 4 does not (for aesthetic reasons). There are also supposed to be minor differences in the image processing engine, which Leica says give images from the D-LUX 4 a classic &#8220;Leica&#8221; look. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s one other difference: the D-LUX 4 costs almost twice as much, which is entirely a &#8220;branding&#8221; thing. *THAT* is why the LX3 is more popular. It has nothing to do with perception; it&#8217;s the REALITY that most people won&#8217;t spend $400 extra for a red sticker. (Although a few will, which is why some D-LUX 4s are being sold.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

