<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Macro Photography Blog &#187; Camera Raves and Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/category/camera-raves-and-rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com</link>
	<description>Point, Click and Shoot Digital Macro Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax K-01 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-k-01-vs-fujifilm-x-pro1/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-k-01-vs-fujifilm-x-pro1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a feature comparison between the newly announced Pentax K-01 and Fujifilm X-Pro1. I&#8217;ve tried my best to ensure the accuracy of this table but if there is an error or a feature you think should be included in this table, let me know in the comment section. One of the things that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Here is a feature comparison between the newly announced Pentax K-01 and Fujifilm X-Pro1. I&#8217;ve tried my best to ensure the accuracy of this table but if there is an error or a feature you think should be included in this table, let me know in the comment section. One of the things that is missing is whether the film simulation on the X-Pro1 can be used when shooting video. Cheers!</p>
<p></p>
<h2>Pentax K-10 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1</h2>
<table class="wptable rowstyle-alt" id="wptable-31"  cellspacing="1">
	<thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:195px" align="left">Pentax K-01</th>
		<th class="sortable" style="width:195px" align="left">Fujifilm X-Pro1</th>
	</tr>
	</thead>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Sensor</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">23.7 x 15.7mm CMOS with primary colour filter</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">23.6 x 15.6mm X-Trans CMOS with primary colour filter</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">16.28 megapixels</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">16.3 megapixels</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Lens</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Pentax K-Mount (compatible with all Pentax Lenses and made-for-Pentax third party lenses)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Propriety Fujifilm X mount</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Image stabilisation</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">In-body sensor shift shake reduction</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">In-lens optical image stabilisation</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Dust removal</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">SP coating and CMOS sensor operations</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Ultrasonic vibration</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Viewfinder</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">None</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Optical, EVF, Hybrid</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Sensitivity</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">ISO 100 to ISO 25600</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">ISO 100 to ISO 25600</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Image formats</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">RAW (DNG), JPG (Exit 2.3), RAW+JPEG</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">RAW (RAF), JPEG (Exif 2.3), RAW+JPEG</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Image sizes (JPEG)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[3:2] 4928 x 3264, 4224 x 2816, 3456 x 2304, 2688 x 1792</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[3:2] 4896 x 3264, 3456 x 2304, 2496 x 1664</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[4:3] 4352 x 3264, 3840 x 2880, 3072 x 2304, 2304 x 1728</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">None</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[16:9] 4928 x 2776, 4224 x 2376, 3456 x 1944, 2688 x 1512</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[16:9] 4896 x 2760, 3456 x 1944, 2496 x 1408</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[1:1]3264 x 3264, 2880 x 2880, 2304 x 2304, 1728 x 1728</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[1:1] 3264 x 3264, 2304 x 2304, 1664 x 1664</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Image sizes (RAW)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[3:2] 4298 x 3264</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">TBC</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Motion panorama</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">N/A</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">[Vertical] 7680 x 2160, 5120 x 2160; [Horizontal] 7680 x 1440, 5120 x 1440</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Movie</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Full HD (1920 x 1080, 16:9, 30fps, 25fps, 24fps)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Full HD (1920 x 1080, 16:9, 24fps)</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">HD (1280 x 720, 16:9, 60fps, 50fps, 30fps, 25fps, 24fps)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">HD (1280 x 720, 16:9, 24fps)</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">VGA 640 x 480, 4:3, 30fps, 25fps, 24fps</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">None</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">MPEG 4 AVC / H.264, up to 25 minutes, Stereo sound</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">H.264 MOV, stereo sound, up to 29 minutes</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Movie processing</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Custome image (Bright, Natural, Portrait, Landscape, Vibrant, Radiant, Muted, Bleach Bypass, Reversal Film, Monochrome, Cross Processing, Digital Filters</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">TBC</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Exposure modes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Program, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority Manual, Bulb, HDR (JPEG only)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Program, Shutter Priority, Aperture Priority, Manual</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Scenes modes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Portrait, Landscape, Macro, Moving Object, Night Scene Portrait, Sunset, Blue Sky, Forest, Night Scene, Night Scene HDR (JPG only), Night Snap, Food, Pet, Kids, Surf & Snow, Backlight Silhouette, Candlelight, Stage Lighting, Museum</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">N/A</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Interval shooting</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">1 sec to 24 hours, up to 999 images</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">TBC</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Interval movie/Time lapse</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Minimum 1 sec to 30 minutes, File format: Motion JPEG (AVI)</td>
		<td style="width:195px" >&nbsp;</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Filters</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Extract Color, Toy Camera, Retro, High Contrast, Shading, Invert Color, Color</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Film simulation: 10 type (PROVIA/STANDARD, Velvia/VIVID, ASTIA/SOFT, PRO Neg Hi, PRO Neg Std, MONOCHROME, MONOCHROME+Ye FILTER, MONOCHROME+R FILTER, MONOCHROME+G FILTER, SEPIA)</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Shutter speed</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">30 sec - 1/4000, Bulb</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">30 sec - 1/4000, Bulb</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Flash sync</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">1/180 sec</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">1/180 sec</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Continuous shooting</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">6fps, 3fps</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">6fps, 3fps</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Pop-up flash</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Yes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">None</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Hotshoe</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Yes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Yes</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Flash modes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-Speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync. High-speed sync available with Pentax dedicated external flash</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Hot shoe with TTL contacts; sync terminal Red-eye removal OFF: Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro, Rear-curtain Synchro. Red-eye removal ON: Red-eye Reduction Auto, Red-eye Reduction & Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Red-eye Reduction & Slow Synchro, Red-eye Reduction & Rear-curtain Synchro.</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">AF assist lamp</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Yes</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Yes</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Autoficus system</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Contras detection AF</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Contrast Detection AF</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Multi-area, Single, Contiuous, Face Detection, Tracking, Select, Spot</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Multi area (49), Single AF, Continuous AF, Manual</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Focus Peaking</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">Distance Indicator</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Self-timer</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">12 sec, 2 sec</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">10 sec, 2 sec</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">LCD monitor</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">3-inch, 921,000 dots</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">3-inch, 1.23 million dots</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td style="width:115px" >&nbsp;</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">100 per cent coverage</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">100 per cent coverage</td>
	</tr>
	<tr class="alt">
		<td style="width:115px" align="left">Price</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">US$749 (body only) or US$899 with the smc PENTAX-DA 40mm F2.8 XS Lens</td>
		<td style="width:195px" align="left">US$1,699.95 (Body only)</td>
	</tr>
</table><p>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-k-01-vs-fujifilm-x-pro1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax Announces K-01 &#8220;Pretty Ugly&#8221; Mirrorless Camera</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-announces-k-01-pretty-ugly-mirrorless-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-announces-k-01-pretty-ugly-mirrorless-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ugly? This was and still is the word used by some commentators to describe the new Pentax camera, the K-01. I won&#8217;t say it&#8217;s ugly though. Neither do I want to say it&#8217;s pretty. It&#8217;s Pentax. It&#8217;s just that. First thing first, it&#8217;s a K-mount camera, meaning all existing K-mount lenses are compatible with it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Ugly? This was and still is the word used by some commentators to describe the new Pentax camera, the K-01. I won&#8217;t say it&#8217;s ugly though. Neither do I want to say it&#8217;s pretty. It&#8217;s Pentax. It&#8217;s just that. First thing first, it&#8217;s a K-mount camera, meaning all existing K-mount lenses are compatible with it. Which is a good thing, because users are not forced to buy into a new system altogether.</p>
<div id="attachment_9141" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 282px">
	<a href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Pentax-K-01-Black.jpg"><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Pentax-K-01-Black.jpg" alt="" title="Pentax K-01 Black" width="282" height="206" class="size-full wp-image-9141" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Pentax K-01 Black</p>
</div>
<p>Also announced together with the K-01 is a super thin lens &#8212; thinner than the thinnest Pancake &#8212; which is also compatible with all Pentax modern DSLRs. The hotshoe on the K-01 is also compatible with all Pentax flashguns, or designed-for-Pentax third party flashes, such as the Metz Mecablitz, I presume.</p>
<div id="attachment_9144" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 227px">
	<a href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/smc-PENTAX-DA-40mm-F2.8-XS-Lens.jpg"><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/smc-PENTAX-DA-40mm-F2.8-XS-Lens.jpg" alt="" title="smc PENTAX-DA 40mm F2.8 XS Lens" width="227" height="533" class="size-full wp-image-9144" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Slim... smc PENTAX-DA 40mm F2.8 XS Lens</p>
</div>
<p><strong>Here are the key features of the K-01:</strong> Priced at US$749 (body only) or US$899 with the thin kit, <strong>durable machined aluminum frame in black, white, or yellow exterior</strong>; compatible all PENTAX K-mount lenses spanning decades, <strong>16 megapixel APS-C sized CMOS image sensor with multiple aspect ratios</strong>, 3-inch LCD with 920,000 dots,<strong> full HD 1080p video capture at 30 FPS with h.264 compression (60 FPS at 720p)</strong>, sensor-shift PENTAX Shake and Dust Reduction system which is compatible with every mounted PENTAX lens, <strong>6 FPS burst mode</strong>, ISO 100-25600, <strong>focus peaking mode for fast and accurate manual focusing for critical focus applications</strong>. It also the first mirrorless to provide a native support of DSLR lenses.</p>
<p><strong>Here are the things I hope to see but didn&#8217;t</strong>: an EVF, a full frame sensor, a tilt-swivel LCD screen, weather-sealing.</p>
<p>With the new Prime M processor, the K-01 sensor is said to be able to top the image quality of Pentax K-5, arguably one of the best-performing APS-C cameras, even in today&#8217;s standard.</p>
<div id="attachment_9148" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 485px">
	<a href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Pentax-K-01-Silver.jpg"><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Pentax-K-01-Silver.jpg" alt="" title="Pentax K-01 Silver" width="485" height="334" class="size-full wp-image-9148" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Pentax K-01 Silver</p>
</div>
<p>Here are some words of the K-01 designer Marc Newson:</p>
<p><iframe width="505" height="287" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/mrXKDrg-xy8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>A hands-on preview of the K-01:</p>
<p><iframe width="505" height="287" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/t-lSQlvqFKs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/02/02/pentax-announces-k-01-pretty-ugly-mirrorless-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Lomo Harinezumi Camera</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/28/digital-lomo-harinezumi-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/28/digital-lomo-harinezumi-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toy Camera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been toying &#8212; (pun, if there is one, is accidental) &#8212; with the idea buying a toy camera for sometime, something like a lomo camera but the thought of buying films, developing them and printing them or investing in a scanner to scan the negative &#8212; which will be an expansive affair &#8212; have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I&#8217;ve been toying &#8212; (pun, if there is one, is accidental) &#8212; with the idea buying a toy camera for sometime, something like a lomo camera but the thought of buying films, developing them and printing them or investing in a scanner to scan the negative &#8212; which will be an expansive affair &#8212; have put off the plan.</p>
<p>A digital lomo camera, therefore, would be an ideal solution. So when the Pentax Q came along, I thought that that would be the lomo camera I was looking for. Yes it is, but no, it lacks the randomness of a lomo camera.</p>
<p>Until I came across with what seems to be a true digital lomo camera, by the name of Digital Harinezumi, released by Superheadz. Here&#8217;s a photo of <s>the toy</s> a person holding the camera, which is sold at Photojojo for US$185 not inclusive of shipping.</p>
<p><a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed"><img src="http://embed.photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/productImages/83188a4.jpg" width="505" height="337" border="0"></a></p>
<p><strong>Buy the <a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed">The Zumi Triple Plus</a></strong> at the <a href="http://photojojo.com/store/embed">Photojojo Store!</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a dreamy macro shot with the camera. It can shoot in macro mode at 3cm, close enough for general macro shooting. </p>
<p><a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed"><img src="http://embed.photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/productImages/zumi-digital-6f23.jpg" width="505" height="337" border="0"></a></p>
<p>The 3-megapixel CMOS sensor camera &#8212; (hmmm&#8230; 3MP? but it&#8217;s a toy camera, right?) &#8212; shoots 640 x 480 video, has a lens of 4.5mm F2.8 and shoots either ISO 100 or ISO 800. The Zumi Triple Plus sold by Photojojo has 10 colour modes.</p>
<p><a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed"><img src="http://embed.photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/productImages/zumi-digital-e5ba.jpg" width="505" height="337" border="0"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed"><img src="http://embed.photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/productImages/zumi-digital-ed46.jpg" width="505" height="337" border="0"></a></p>
<p><strong>Buy the <a href="http://photojojo.com/store/awesomeness/zumi-digital/embed">The Zumi Triple Plus</a></strong> at the <a href="http://photojojo.com/store/embed">Photojojo Store!</a></p>
<p>Digital <a href="http://jpgmag.com/stories/18530">Harinezumi review</a> can be found at JPG magazine. There is an active Harinezumi community over at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=harinezumi+camera&#038;m=tags">Flickr</a>. Here&#8217;s a video sample of the tiny thing:</p>
<p><iframe width="505" height="372" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/yu841zs1rZs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/28/digital-lomo-harinezumi-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New La Sardina Special Edition Lomo Camera</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/new-la-sardina-special-edition-lomo-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/new-la-sardina-special-edition-lomo-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lomography International has introduced two new versions of the La Sardina lomo camera series &#8212; the special &#8220;Reptilia&#8221; edition for the you-know-what-occasion on Feb 14. The Orinoco Ochre is the one in bright orange while the one in blue is called Sapphire Serpent. The reptile motif can be seen from the pattern on the sardine&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Lomography International has introduced two new versions of the La Sardina lomo camera series &#8212; the special &#8220;Reptilia&#8221; edition for the you-know-what-occasion on Feb 14. The Orinoco Ochre is the one in bright orange while the one in blue is called Sapphire Serpent. The reptile motif can be seen from the pattern on the sardine&#8217;s &#8220;skin.&#8221;</p>
<p><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/la-sardina.jpg" alt="" title="la sardina" width="505" height="447" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9057" /></p>
<p>Check the new editions at <a href="http://www.lomography.com/">lomography.com</a>. Alternatively, you can check all the other <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=La%20Sardina&#038;tag=jaxsblo-20&#038;index=photo&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">La Sardina</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=jaxsblo-20&#038;l=ur2&#038;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />editions over at Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/new-la-sardina-special-edition-lomo-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man, I Want This Minox!</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/man-i-want-this-minox/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/man-i-want-this-minox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you just want to buy something because of how it looks. The Minox Gold Plated mini rangfinder-style camera is one such item. It &#8220;only&#8221; has 5.1 megapixel and is of no rival to other compact cameras in terms of functionality &#8212; it has no HD video, for instance &#8212; but with this kind of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Sometimes you just want to buy something because of how it looks. The Minox Gold Plated mini rangfinder-style camera is one such item. It &#8220;only&#8221; has 5.1 megapixel and is of no rival to other compact cameras in terms of functionality &#8212; it has no HD video, for instance &#8212; but with this kind of classic magnetism, it makes all these other camera functions something of a &#8220;besides-the-point&#8221; matter.</p>
<div id="attachment_9037" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 484px">
	<img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Minox-Gold-Plated.jpg" alt="" title="Minox Gold Plated" width="484" height="323" class="size-full wp-image-9037" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Collector&#039;s item... Minox DCC 5.1MP</p>
</div>
<p>The <a href="www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/741125-USA/Minox_60672_DCC_5_1_Digital_Camera.html/BI/7008/KBID/7568">Minox Gold Plated</a> is priced at US$299.95 over at BH Photovideo. But there is also the <a href="www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/741125-USA/Minox_60672_DCC_5_1_Digital_Camera.html/BI/7008/KBID/7568 ">black and silver</a> version (below) at US$179.</p>
<div id="attachment_9046" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 485px">
	<img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Minox-Silver.jpg" alt="" title="Minox Silver" width="485" height="485" class="size-full wp-image-9046" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Minox silver and black edition</p>
</div>
<p>Key features: German technology, 5.1MP CMOS Sensor, 9mm F/2.0 Lens (43mm Equivalent), QVGA (320 x 240) Video, 128MB Internal Memory, accepts SD card up to 16GB and Operates on 1 Li-Ion Battery. Here is a gallery of <a href="http://www.minox.com/index.php?id=4700&#038;L=1">Minox DCC 5.1 sample images</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_9050" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 485px">
	<img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Minox-Back.jpg" alt="" title="Minox Back" width="485" height="485" class="size-full wp-image-9050" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">2-inch LCD</p>
</div>
<p>The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/search?ie=UTF8&#038;keywords=Minox&#038;tag=jaxsblo-20&#038;index=photo&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325">Minox is also available on Amazon.</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=jaxsblo-20&#038;l=ur2&#038;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/27/man-i-want-this-minox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camera-Car Analogy</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/camera-car-analogy/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/camera-car-analogy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=9006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often hear the car analogy is being used to describe a camera &#8212; you know, things like the Leica M9 being a Bentley or a Hummer and so on &#8212; but I have never come across a camera being used to describe a car. Not that it&#8217;s important. Just thinking. So, what then is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>We often hear the car analogy is being used to describe a camera &#8212; you know, things like the Leica M9 being a Bentley or a Hummer and so on &#8212; but I have never come across a camera being used to describe a car. </p>
<p>Not that it&#8217;s important. Just thinking. So, what then is the camera equivalent of a Range Rover Evoque? A Fujifilm X-Pro1?</p>
<div id="attachment_9012" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 485px">
	<img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Evoque.jpg" alt="" title="Evoque" width="485" height="243" class="size-full wp-image-9012" />
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Range Rover Evoque... Image credit: Land Rover UK</p>
</div>
<div id="attachment_9014" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 485px">
	<a href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Fujifilm-XPro1.jpg"><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Fujifilm-XPro1.jpg" alt="" title="Fujifilm XPro1" width="485" height="339" class="size-full wp-image-9014" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Fujifilm X-Pro1... Image Credit: Fujifilm</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/camera-car-analogy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon G1 X, Fujifilm X-Pro1, Neck-to-neck In Popularity</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/canon-gx-1-fujifilm-xpro-1-neck-to-neck-in-popularity-race/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/canon-gx-1-fujifilm-xpro-1-neck-to-neck-in-popularity-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=8982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Canon G1 X and Fujifilm X-Pro1 (notice the Xs and the 1s?) are neck-to-neck in popularity, at least going by the number of clicks on dpreview website. Yesterday, they were tied at 11.4 per cent and remained tied most of the time today at 12.7 per cent, occupying the top two spots of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>The new Canon G1 X and Fujifilm X-Pro1 (notice the Xs and the 1s?) are neck-to-neck in popularity, at least going by the number of clicks on dpreview website. Yesterday, they were tied at 11.4 per cent and remained tied most of the time today at 12.7 per cent, occupying the top two spots of dpreview&#8217;s popularity table, with the G1 X emerging top on &#8216;alphabetical advantage!&#8217;</p>
<div id="attachment_8988" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 318px">
	<a href="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Canon_Fujifilm.jpg"><img src="http://macro-photography-blog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Canon_Fujifilm.jpg" alt="" title="Canon_Fujifilm" width="318" height="223" class="size-full wp-image-8988" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">A snapshot of dpreview&#039;s table as of January 12 <br />(January 11 in the US)</p>
</div>
<p>This comes just days after the announcement of the two cameras, which cannot be said to be of the same league. The G1 X is cheaper, at US$800, but promises DSLR-quality images while the X-Pro1, with interchangeable lens, promises versatility, resolution as well as image quality.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see which one of these two losing the steam first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/12/canon-gx-1-fujifilm-xpro-1-neck-to-neck-in-popularity-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujifilm X-Pro1 Macro Samples</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/11/fujifilm-x-pro1-macro-samples/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/11/fujifilm-x-pro1-macro-samples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=8962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who are curious about the new Fujifilm X-Pro1, here is a series of nine sample images taken with the camera, three of them are macro pictures. The two photographs, here and here, were taken with the FUJINON LENS XF60mmF2.4 R Macro (90mm equivalent in 35mm term). The other one was taken [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>For those of you who are curious about the new Fujifilm X-Pro1, here is a series of <a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/">nine sample images</a> taken with the camera, three of them are macro pictures. The two photographs, <a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/img/index/pic_09.jpg">here </a>and <a href="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/img/index/pic_07.jpg">here</a>, were taken with the FUJINON LENS XF60mmF2.4 R Macro (90mm equivalent in 35mm term). The <a href="FUJINON LENS XF35mmF1.4 R">other one</a> was taken with the FUJINON LENS XF35mmF1.4 R (50mm equivalent).</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.1001noisycameras.com/2012/01/five-fuil-size-real-world-fuji-x-pro-1-jpeg-samples.html">1001Noisy</a>, via <a href="http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2012/01/first-x-pro-1-original-full-size.html">RiceHigh</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/11/fujifilm-x-pro1-macro-samples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are There People Not Impressed With Canon G1X?</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/10/why-are-there-people-not-impressed-with-canon-g1x/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/10/why-are-there-people-not-impressed-with-canon-g1x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=8952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canon GX1 is probably one of the very few compact cameras in which image quality cannot be disputed even way before it hits the market. Its large sensor (for a compact) and the fact that it is a Canon G camera, promise nothing less than that. But why are there people dismissing it as unimpressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Canon GX1 is probably one of the very few compact cameras in which image quality cannot be disputed even way before it hits the market. Its large sensor (for a compact) and the fact that it is a Canon G camera, promise nothing less than that. But why are there people dismissing it as unimpressive (to borrow the word of one of the forum members over at dpreview)?</p>
<p>Why are there people not excited about it? Would the first impression be any different had the mirrorless cameras never been invented? Would there be an all round applause if the lens had been wider and faster and the burst mode firing more rapidly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2012/01/10/why-are-there-people-not-impressed-with-canon-g1x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fujifilm X10 Available For RM2,088 At Shashinki, Free Shipping Within Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2011/11/21/fujifilm-x10-available-for-rm2088-at-shashinki-free-shipping-within-malaysia/</link>
		<comments>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2011/11/21/fujifilm-x10-available-for-rm2088-at-shashinki-free-shipping-within-malaysia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaxon S</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Camera Raves and Rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macro-photography-blog.com/?p=8931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critically-acclaimed advanced compact camera, Fujifilm X10, is now available in Malaysia at the price of RM2,088 online from Shashinki, Malaysia&#8217;s premier online photography retailer. Not sure how much different the price is at the shop but RM2,088 for something as compelling as the X10 is a very good price point indeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Critically-acclaimed advanced compact camera, Fujifilm X10, is now available in Malaysia at the price of RM2,088 online from <a href="http://shashinki.com/shop/fujifilm-digital-camera-black-free-memory-card-12mp-cmos-28112mm-lens-diecast-magnesium-alloy-1080p-movie-p-9278.html">Shashinki</a>, Malaysia&#8217;s premier online photography retailer. Not sure how much different the price is at the shop but RM2,088 for something as compelling as the X10 is a very good price point indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://macro-photography-blog.com/2011/11/21/fujifilm-x10-available-for-rm2088-at-shashinki-free-shipping-within-malaysia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

